Dismissed
Atul Gupta & Anr. v. MCD & Ors.
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/7654/2007
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution as none appeared on behalf of the petitioners on multiple listed dates.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~R-6
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- W.P.(C) 7654/2007
¶4
- ATUL GUPTA & ANR .....Petitioners
¶5
- Through: None.
¶6
- versus
¶7
MCD & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Pritish Sabharwal, Adv. for MCD
¶8
CORAM:
¶9
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
¶10
O R D E R % 22.07.2024
¶11
- None appears on behalf of the petitioners. It is noted that none had appeared on behalf of the petitioners even on 01.07.2024, 08.07.2024 as well as on 15.07.2024.
¶12
- Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Atul Gupta & Anr
- respondent
MCD & ORS
Coram
AI extract
Purushaindram Kumar Kaurav
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court