Petitioners filed writ petitions in the High Court of Delhi. They informed the court that a One Time Settlement had been finalized with respondent-banks and sought to withdraw the petitions. The court dismissed the petitions as withdrawn.
dismissed as withdrawn
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~128 and 130
PAWAN SETHI ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms. Shivangi Bajpai, Advocate. (M): 8306098849 Email: [email protected]
versus
UNION BANK OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. O. P. Gaggar with Mr. Sachindra Karn, Advocates for respondent No.1/Union Bank of India
Through: Ms. Shivangi Bajpai, Advocate. (M): 8306098849
Email: [email protected]
versus
UNION BANK OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. O. P. Gaggar with Mr. Sachindra Karn, Advocates for respondent No.1/Union Bank of India
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
O R D E R % 20.05.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/07/2024 at 12:20:31
petitioners have already finalised a One Time Settlement (“OTS”) with the respondent-banks. Thus, she submits that she has instructions to withdraw the present petitions.
MINI PUSHKARNA, J
MAY 20, 2024 c
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/07/2024 at 12:20:31
Pawan Sethi
Aman Sethi
Union Bank of India
Mini Pushkarna
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
