Writ petition withdrawn at petitioner's request and dismissed as withdrawn by the Delhi High Court; no substantive decision recorded.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~33
BIKASH KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, Adv.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Pavan Narang, Sr. Panel Counsel with Mr. Himanshu Sethi and Ms. Aishwarya Chhabra, Advs. with SST. Vikash Kumar and SST. Ashok Kumar for R1 to R3. Mr. H.S. Dahiya and Mr. Yuv Dahiya, Advs. for R5.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE O R D E R % 09.01.2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner states, he has instructions to withdraw the writ petition.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
SAURABH BANERJEE, J
JANUARY 09, 2024/ jg
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/05/2024 at 14:30:22
BIKASH KUMAR
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
V. KAMESWAR RAO
SAURABH BANERJEE
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
