Writ petition against an insurer over a claim was withdrawn after the parties amicably settled; the respondent agreed to pay the claimed amount by demand draft, and the High Court dismissed the petition as satisfied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~178
SARITA YADAV .....Petitioner Through: Mr. N.R. Swetabh, Adv.
versus
KOTAK MAHINDRA LIFE INSURANCE & ORS.
.....Respondents
Through: Mr. Kumar Mihir and Mr. Athul Joseph, Advs. for respondents Mr. Abhishek Nanda and Ms. Hrishika Rawat, Adv. for R- 4/IRDAI
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA O R D E R % 08.10.2024
CM APPL. 59511/2024 (For withdrawal of petition)
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 08:22:55
than 15 days from today.
DHARMESH SHARMA, J.
OCTOBER 08, 2024 sp/E
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 08:22:55
Sarita Yadav
Kotak Mahindra Life Insurance & Ors.
Dharmesh Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
