Dismissed
Neha v. the State NCT of Delhi and Ors.
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/6437/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed in default for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear on the date of hearing or on an earlier date.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~87
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- W.P.(C) 6437/2024 NEHA ..... Petitioner Through: None. versus
¶4
THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Harshit Chopra, Adv. for R-2 /MCD (through v/c) Mr. Divyam Nandrajog, Panel Counsel and Mr. Mayank Kamra, Adv. for R-1 and 3 and SI Om Prakash (ANT) SI Om Prakash, ANTF, Crime Branch.
¶5
CORAM:
¶6
- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA O R D E R
¶7
- % 14.05.2024
¶8
- None appears for the petitioner.
¶9
- Even on the last date of hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of the petitioner.
¶10
- Accordingly, the present petition along with pending application, is dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
¶11
SACHIN DATTA, J
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Neha
- respondent
The State NCT of Delhi
Coram
AI extract
Sachin Datta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court