Writ petition before the Delhi High Court; counsel for the petitioner sought leave to withdraw the petition, and the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~7
DR. NEELAM BHALLA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pratap Singh, Adv.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shoumendu Mukherji, SPC with Ms. Megha Sharma and Ms. Arya Jha, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
O R D E R % 30.09.2024
1. Mr. Pratap Singh, learned Counsel for petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition.
2. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
C.HARI SHANKAR, J.
DR. SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J.
SEPTEMBER 30, 2024/ N
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 02:01:23
Dr. Neelam Bhalla
Union of India
C. Hari Shankar
Sudhir Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
