The Supreme Court allowed a petition seeking condonation of delay for a review and dismissed a subsequent review petition as an attempt to re-argue the matter.
Condonation of 10 days delay allowed; review petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~42
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, DELHI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Nitesh Kumar Singh, Adv for Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, S.C.
versus
BRIJESH MOOLVANSHI & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.S.Sunil, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR O R D E R % 10.04.2024
CM APPL. 21707/2024 -Ex.
CM APPL. 21708/2024 -Delay 10 days.
REVIEW PET. 162/2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/04/2024 at 12:05:51
REKHA PALLI, J
RAJNISH BHATNAGAR, J
APRIL 10, 2024 sr
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/04/2024 at 12:05:51
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the application for condonation of delay in filing a review petition should be allowed.
Whether the review petition expanding arguments constitutes a valid review under the limited jurisdiction thereof.
Commissioner of Police, Delhi
Brijesh Moolvanshi
Rekha Palli
Rajnish Bhatnagar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
