Dismissed

Director General Esic & Ors. v. Sarwan Kumar & Ors.

Delhi HC3 May 2024W.P.(C)/6228/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed three writ petitions challenging orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal. Relying on the Tribunal's direction that the relief was subject to WP(C) 18/2015, the Court found no reason to entertain the current petitions and disposed of them subject to that pending W.P.

What did the court decide?

The writ petitions are dismissed and the relief granted under the impugned order remains subject to the outcome of W.P.(C) 18/2015.

Director General Esic & Ors. Vs Sarwan Kumar… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~36 to 38

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(C) 6228/2024, CM APPL. 25951/2024- Stay, CM APPL. 25952/2024- Exp., CM APPL. 25953/2024- Exp. from filing certified copy of Judgment

¶4

DIRECTOR GENERAL ESIC & ORS.

¶5

..... Petitioners

¶6

Through: Mr. T.Singhdev, Mr. Abhijit Chakravarty, Mr .Bhanu Gulati, Mr. Tanishq Srivastava, Mr.Arun Hussain, Mr. Abhas Sathramani and Mr.Sourabh Kumar, Advs.

¶7

versus

¶8

SARWAN KUMAR & ORS. ..... Respondents

¶9

Through: None

¶10

37 W.P.(C) 6229/2024, CM APPL. 25954/2024- Exp.,CM APPL. 25955/2024- Exp. from filing certified copy of Judgment, CM APPL. 26022/2024-Stay

¶11

DIRECTOR GENERAL ESIC & ORS. ..... Petitioners

¶12

Through: Mr. T.Singhdev, Mr. Abhijit Chakravarty, Mr .Bhanu Gulati, Mr. Tanishq Srivastava, Mr.Arun Hussain, Mr. Abhas Sathramani and Mr.Sourabh Kumar, Advs.

¶13

versus

¶14

ISHWAR CHAND & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: None

¶15

¶16

W.P.(C) 6233/2024, CM APPL. 25974/2024- Stay, CM APPL. 25975/2024- Exp., CM APPL. 25976/2024- Exp. from filing certified copy of Judgment

¶17

This is a digitally signed order.

¶18

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/05/2024 at 11:37:33

¶19

DIRECTOR GENERAL ESIC & ORS. ..... Petitioners

¶20

Through: Mr. T.Singhdev, Mr. Abhijit Chakravarty, Mr .Bhanu Gulati, Mr. Tanishq Srivastava, Mr.Arun Hussain, Mr. Abhas Sathramani and Mr.Sourabh Kumar, Advs.

¶21

versus

¶22

MAHENDER SINGH & ORS. ..... Respondents

¶23

Through: None

¶24

CORAM:

¶25

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE

¶26

O R D E R % 03.05.2024

¶27

The present writ petitions seek to assail the common order dated 30.01.2023 passed in three OAs by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal. Vide the impugned order, the learned Tribunal has allowed the original applications filed by the respondents/applicants by relying on its decisions in various earlier OAs, including OA no. 1330/2019.

¶28

From a perusal of the impugned order, we find that while allowing the original applications, the learned Tribunal has categorically directed that the relief granted to the respondents would remain subject to the outcome of W.P.(C) 18/2015, i.e, the writ petition pending before this court wherein the order dated 19.12.2013 passed in OA 3227/2011, has been assailed. It may be noted that based on the order dated 19.12.2013 passed in OA 3227/2011, various other OAs were allowed, including OA 1330/2019.

¶29

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/05/2024 at 11:37:33

¶30

In the light of the aforesaid and taking into account the fact that the learned Tribunal has itself clarified that the relief granted to the respondents would remain subject to the outcome of the pending writ petitions filed by the petitioners to assail the orders passed in OA 3227/2011 as also in OA 1330/2019, we find absolutely no reason to entertain the present writ petitions. In our view, once the respondents have already been put to notice that the relief granted to them would be dependent upon the outcome of the pending writ petitions, no useful purpose would be served by keeping these petitions pending.

¶31

We, therefore, dispose of the present writ petitions by clarifying that the relief granted under the impugned order would remain subject to the outcome of the W.P.(C) 18/2015 and other connected writ petitions.

¶32

The writ petitions are, accordingly, dismissed.

¶33

A copy of this order be forwarded to the respondents.

¶34

REKHA PALLI, J

¶35

SAURABH BANERJEE, J

¶36

MAY 3, 2024/rr

¶37

This is a digitally signed order.

¶38

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/05/2024 at 11:37:33

Director General Esic & Ors. v. Sarwan Kumar & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Director General Esic & Ors. v. Sarwan Kumar & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Powertech Electroinfra Private Limited Vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax Cental CIRCLE-25 Delhi & Anr.

Csl Food Products Private Limited Vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax Central CIRCLE-28 Delhi & Anr.

Kamlesh Rani Jain Vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax Cental CIRCLE-28 Delhi & Anr.

Yulduzhan Urakova Vs Foreigners Regional Registration Officer

Shri Shis Pal Singh & Ors. Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Zenith Leisure Holidays Ltd. Vs Union of India & Anr.

Shiv Raj Singh Vs the Board of Discipline of Icai & Anr.

Jakson Power Private Limited Vs Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs & Anr.

Employees State Insurance Corporation Vs Dr. Ashok Kumar Gupta

Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board Dsssb Andanr Vs Paras Goel

Manish Kumar Vs Delhi Metro Rail Corporation

Commissioner of Police and Ors. Vs Smt Kanta Devi

Employee State Insurance Corporation Vs Narendra Kumar Verma

Inder Jit Dua Vs Gnct of Delhi and Ors.