Disposed

Anil Madan v. Assistant Collector, Gr-Ii & Anr.

Delhi HC3 May 2024W.P.(C)/6217/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Delhi granted liberty to the petitioner to approach the Tribunal for an expeditious listing of an application seeking waiver of pre-deposit. The court directed respondents to refrain from coercive action until listing or a specified deadline.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to approach Tribunal for expeditious listing of waiver application; direction to respondents not to take coercive action.

Anil Madan Vs Assistant Collector, Gr-Ii & Anr. — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~29

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

Judgment delivered on: 03.05.2024

¶4

W.P.(C) 6217/2024 & CM APPL. 25895-96/2024

¶5

ANIL MADAN ..... Petitioner

¶6

versus

¶7

ASSISTANT COLLECTOR, GR-II & ANR. ..... Respondents

¶8

Advocates who appeared in this case:

¶9

For the Petitioner: Mr. Ramesh Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sumit K. Batra, Mr. Manish Khurana, Ms. Priyanka Jindal and Ms. Nanya, Advocates

¶10

For the Respondents: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Mr. Yash Upadhyay and Mr. Siddhant Dutt, Advocates for GNCTD Mr. Harpreet Singh, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms. Suhani Mathur, Mr. Jatin Kumar Gaur, Ms. Pritika Nagpal, Mr. Lalit Kumar Chaudhary, Ms. Sonia, Mr. Anil Nagar, Mr. Jagdish Chandra and Mr. Suraj Bhan, Advocates for R-2

¶11

CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA JUDGMENT

¶12

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

¶13

Petitioner inter-alia seeks quashing of proceedings arising out

¶14

Signature Not Verified

¶15

W.P.(C) 6217/2024 Page 1 of 3

¶16

Digitally Signed By:RASHIM KAPOOR Signing Da te:0 9.05.2024 11:57:09

¶17

of Order in Original dated 27.05.2020.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by order dated 08.02.2024 in W.P.(C) No.1824/2024, this Court had permitted the petitioner to move an application seeking waiver of the pre-deposit amount for adjudication of the appeal filed by the petitioner. He submits that petitioner has filed an application, however, the same has been cleared and numbered only yesterday on 02.05.2024 and as per his instructions, the application takes a substantial time for listing before the Tribunal. He submits that the respondents are pressing for execution of the order dated 27.05.2020 and seeking to recover the amount from the petitioner. He prays that appropriate time be granted to the petitioner to have the application listed for consideration before the Tribunal.

¶19

Learned counsel appearing for the respondents concede that the applications that are cleared before listing take some time for listing before the Tribunal.

¶20

Learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 1 assures that till 31.05.2024, they shall not take any precipitative steps pending listing and consideration of the application by the Tribunal.

¶21

In view of the above, liberty is given to the petitioner to approach the Tribunal for an expeditious listing of the application seeking waiver of the pre-deposit.

¶22

Signature Not Verified

¶23

W.P.(C) 6217/2024 Page 2 of 3

¶24

Digitally Signed By:RASHIM KAPOOR Signing Da te:0 9.05.2024 11:57:09

¶25

It is further directed that no coercive action shall be taken till the time the application seeking waiver of the pre-deposit is listed before the Tribunal, or till 31.05.2024 whichever is earlier.

¶26

It is clarified that the protection shall lapse on 31.05.2024, or on listing of the application whichever is earlier and thereafter any further action would be subject to the orders passed by the Tribunal.

¶27

Petition is disposed of in the above terms.

¶28

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J

¶29

MAY 3, 2024/‘ rs’ RAVINDER DUDEJA, J

¶30

Signature Not Verified

¶31

W.P.(C) 6217/2024 Page 3 of 3

¶32

Digitally Signed By:RASHIM KAPOOR Signing Da te:0 9.05.2024 11:57:09

Anil Madan v. Assistant Collector, Gr-Ii & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Madan v. Assistant Collector, Gr-Ii & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Powertech Electroinfra Private Limited Vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax Cental CIRCLE-25 Delhi & Anr.

Csl Food Products Private Limited Vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax Central CIRCLE-28 Delhi & Anr.

Kamlesh Rani Jain Vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax Cental CIRCLE-28 Delhi & Anr.

Yulduzhan Urakova Vs Foreigners Regional Registration Officer

Shri Shis Pal Singh & Ors. Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Zenith Leisure Holidays Ltd. Vs Union of India & Anr.

Shiv Raj Singh Vs the Board of Discipline of Icai & Anr.

Jakson Power Private Limited Vs Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs & Anr.

Karan Kumar Agarwal and HUF Prop Manyata Enterprises Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi through Chief Secretary & Ors.

Komal Enterprises Vs the Commissioner of GST Delhi & Anr.

Commissioner of Customs Acc Export Vs M S Arihant Overseas

M S Bharat Udyog through Its Partner Vs Union of India & Ors.

Mil Vehicles and Technologies Private Limited Vs Deputy Commissioner GST Delhi East Commissionerate & Anr.

M/S Hari Om Enterprises Vs Principal Commissioner of Department of Trade and Taxes, Government of NCT of Delhi