Disposed

Dr Vinod Kumari v. Delhi Transport Corporation (Hq)

Delhi HC1 May 2024W.P.(C)/6116/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition challenging a CAT order dismissing an OA with liberty to make a representation. Petitioner did not press the petition; the court disposed of it granting one week to file a comprehensive representation (including prayers for deputation extension and absorption) and directed the respondent to decide it within two weeks by a reasoned speaking order.

What did the court decide?

One week granted to file representation; respondent directed to decide within two weeks by reasoned speaking order.

Dr Vinod Kumari Vs Delhi Transport Corporation (Hq) — Service and Employment | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~60

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(C) 6116/2024 DR VINOD KUMARI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Arun Bhardwaj, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Shrutanjaya Bhardwaj, Mr.Tanmay Vashishtha, Ms.Neha Mishra & Mr.Omkar Hemanth, Advs.

¶4

versus

¶5

DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION (HQ) ..... Respondent Through: Mrs.Avnish Ahlawat, SC, GNCTD with Mr.Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms.Laavanya Kaushik & Ms.Aliza Alam, Advs.

¶6

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE O R D E R % 01.05.2024

¶7

CM APPL. 25365/2024

¶8

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶9

The application stands disposed of.

¶10

W.P.(C) 6116/2024, CM APPL. 25363/2024 (additional documents) & CM APPL. 25364/2024 (interim documents)

¶11

The present writ petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India seeks to assail the order dated 22.02.2024 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal) in OA

¶12

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/05/2024 at 13:03:20

¶13

No.680/2024. Vide the impugned order, the learned Tribunal has dismissed the original application filed by the petitioner/applicant by granting liberty to the petitioner to make a comprehensive representation before the respondent within a period of fifteen days with a further direction to the respondent to decide the same within a period of eight weeks.

¶14

After some arguments, learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that instead of pressing the present petition, the petitioner will submit a comprehensive representation to the respondent as per the liberty granted under the impugned order. He, however, seeks that it may be made clear that in her representation, the petitioner would also be entitled to press her prayer for absorption as per the rules. He prays that taking into account that the petitioner’s deputation is likely to come to an end on 16.06.2024, the time granted by the learned Tribunal to the respondent for disposal of the representation be reduced.

¶15

Mrs.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate, who appears on advance notice on behalf of the respondent and fairly submits that she has no objection to this limited request.

¶16

In the light of the aforesaid stand taken by the parties, we dispose of the petition by granting the petitioner one week’s time to make a representation in terms of the impugned order wherein she may inter alia seek extension of her deputation as also seek absorption. We simultaneously direct the respondent to decide the said representation, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the said representation, by passing a reasoned and speaking order dealing with

¶17

¶18

all the grounds as may be raised by the petitioner in her representation.

¶19

The writ petition along with all pending applications stands disposed of.

¶20

REKHA PALLI, J

¶21

SAURABH BANERJEE, J

¶22

MAY 1, 2024 kk

¶23

Dr Vinod Kumari v. Delhi Transport Corporation (Hq)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr Vinod Kumari v. Delhi Transport Corporation (Hq)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Fides Distribution P. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax Delhi South & Ors.

Om Trans Logistics Ltd. Vs the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 19(1) Delhi & Anr.

Bhagat Singh Vs Union of India & Ors.

Raash Mechanicals Private Limited Vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax Cental CIRCLE-25 Delhi & Anr.

Powertech Electroinfra Private Limited Vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax Cental CIRCLE-25 Delhi & Anr.

Csl Food Products Private Limited Vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax Central CIRCLE-28 Delhi & Anr.

Kamlesh Rani Jain Vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax Cental CIRCLE-28 Delhi & Anr.

Yulduzhan Urakova Vs Foreigners Regional Registration Officer

Ashwani Dagar and Ors. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors. Vs Delhi Flood Control Workers Union & Ors.

Dr. Ashok Kumar Panda Vs Union of India & Ors.

Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board Dsssb Andanr Vs Paras Goel

Manish Kumar Vs Delhi Metro Rail Corporation

Anil Kumar Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi