The petitioner failed to appear for several hearings despite notices. The High Court dismissed the writ petition in default for non-prosecution and vacated all interim orders.
Petition dismissed in default; all interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
versus
B.S.E.S RAJDHANI POWER LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rishab Raj Jain, Standing Counsel for BSESRPL alongwith Mr. Harshal Arora, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA O R D E R % 04.01.2024
SACHIN DATTA, J
JANUARY 4, 2024/r
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2024 at 15:18:17
P.N.M. Enterprises
B.S.E.S. Rajdhani Power Ltd.
Sachin Datta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
