Counsel sought discharge as petitioners were unresponsive; the court discharged counsel and dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution, no one appearing for the petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~ R-2
SAHEB SINGH & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr.S.S.Tomar, Advocate
versus
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr.Pankaj Vivek and Mr.Sachin Kumar Sharma, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R % 02.09.2024
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
SEPTEMBER 2, 2024 SV
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/09/2024 at 12:30:20
SAHEB SINGH & ORS.
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
