Respondent no.1 applied for release of an amount deposited with the Delhi High Court Registry pursuant to a 2018 order in a writ petition that was later dismissed for non-appearance of petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~47
CHINA AIRLINES .....Petitioner
Through: None
versus
SMT. SONICA GUPTA TYAGI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Puneet Saini Advocate for respondent no.1
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
O R D E R % 24.04.2025
CM APPL. 69097/2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 19:31:32
ANISH DAYAL, J
APRIL 24, 2025 /sm/bp
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 19:31:32
China Airlines
Smt. Sonica Gupta Tyagi
Anish Dayal
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
