The High Court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one, more specifically describing the petitioner's objection to the Respondent No.2 entering a contract solely with Respondent No.3.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
NPS TEST HOUSE ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Aman Chillar and Mr. Sanjeev Lakra, Advocates.
versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Pradeep Kumar Jha, SPC with Mr. Vivek Nagar, GP and Mr. Karan Wadhwa, Advocate for R-1.
Mr. Santosh Kumar and Mr. Adithya Ramani, Advocates for R-2. Mr. B.K. Mishra and Mr. Vidyanshu Kumar, Advocates with Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Manager Legal for R-3.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD O R D E R % 03.05.2024
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
MAY 3, 2024 hsk
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/05/2024 at 11:38:40
NPS Test House
Union of India
Subramonium Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
