Writ petition challenging income tax proceedings; counsel stated proceedings had been withdrawn, rendering the petition infructuous. Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous and disposed of the interim relief application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~109
SANTOSH INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED (THROUGH DIRECTOR) ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ved Jain, Mr. Nishchay Kantoor and Ms. Soniya Dodeja, Advs.
versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 22(3), DELHI & ORS.
..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sunil Agarwal, SSC along with Mr. Shivansh B. Panday, JSC and Mr. Utkarsh Tiwari, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
CM APPL. 21892/2024 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Application is disposed of.
W.P.(C) 5333/2024 & CM APPL. 21891/2024 (Interim Relief)
Learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner states that the impugned proceedings which had been initiated have been withdrawn. In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is rendered infructuous. It is accordingly dismissed as such.
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J.
APRIL 15, 2024/ RW
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 01:07:06
Santosh Infratech Private Limited (through Director)
Income Tax Officer Ward 22(3), Delhi
Yashwant Varma
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
