Petitioner sought withdrawal of a writ petition, stating the relief had become infructuous due to a subsequent notification by the SDM Kapashera. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~26
RAJINDER S/O PHOOL SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohit K. Jakhar, Mr. Sandeep Dahiya, Mr. Mukesh, Mohd. Sameen Mr. Naresh Ranga and Mr. Ankur Jakhkar, Advocates
versus
GOVERNMENT OF NCT DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rishikesh Kumar, ASC with Ms. Sheenu Priya, Mr. Atik Gill, Mr. Sudhir Kumar Shukla and Mr. Sudhir, Advocates for GNCTD Mr. Aiswhary Jaiswal, Advocate for DDA
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
% 02.04.2024 (The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid Mode)
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
APRIL 2, 2024/ms
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/04/2024 at 12:38:47
Rajinder S/o Phool Singh
Government of NCT Delhi & Ors.
Tushar Rao Gedela
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
