Disposed

L/Insp/Exe Pushpanjli Kumari v. Union of India & Ors.

Delhi HC10 Apr 2024W.P.(C)/5287/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner, a civilian instructor in CISF, sought writs to quash her posting order to Arakkonam and direction to post her home zone. Court directed fresh representation for posting options near Kanpur. Exemption allowed subject to exceptions pending fresh representation; impugned petition disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Exemption allowed subject to exceptions. Applicant directed to submit representation for posting options near Kanpur within one week. Impugned petition disposed of pending decision on fresh representa

L/Insp/Exe Pushpanjli Kumari Vs Union of India & Ors. — Service and Employment | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~78

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 5287/2024, CM APPLs. 21598/2024, 21599/2024 & 21600/2024

¶4

L/INSP/EXE PUSHPANJLI KUMARI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Devendra Kumar Sharma, Adv. with Ms. Deepak Panwar, Mr. Somrat Panwar, Mr. Abhinav Sharma and Ms. Rekha Sharma, Advs.

¶5

versus

¶6

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vivek Sharma, Sr. PC with Ms. Prernaa Singh, Adv. with Mr. Kapil Yadav, GP for UOI

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

% 10.04.2024

¶11

CM APPLs. 21599/2024 & 21600/2024 (for exemption)

¶12

Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.

¶13

Applications are disposed of.

¶14

W.P.(C) 5287/2024, CM APPL. 21598/2024

¶15

This petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following

¶16

prayers:

¶17

“It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased:-

¶18

A. To issue Writ(s), Order(s), Direction(s) more in the nature of writ of certiorari thereby quashing the impugned posting order vide letter no. E-38024/RTC/Instructor/PostingI1/2023/4706 dated 20.12.2023; order of posting to CISF RTC, Arakkonam issued vide FHQ SO No. 731/2023 dated 20.12.2023 and TSHQ SO No. 1/2024 dated 01.01.2024;

¶19

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 01:06:50

¶20

B. To issue Writ(s), Order(s), Direction(s) in the nature of writ of mandamus thereby directing the Respondents to post the Petitioner in home zone units as requested vide application dated 27.01.2024;

¶21

C. To award any other/ further relief(s) as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in favor of the petitioner and against the respondents alongwith cost in the interest of justice.”

¶22

We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents. It transpired that if the petitioner makes a fresh representation expressing her desire to be posted at any Airport near Kanpur, the same shall be considered by the respondents subject to availability of vacancy.

¶23

If that be so, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he shall make representation within one week from today giving the options of the places to be posted which shall be considered by the respondents within four weeks thereafter and the decision be conveyed to the petitioner.

¶24

Till such time, the decision is taken, the respondents shall not insist upon her joining at Arakkonam. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the order to be passed by the respondents, she shall seek such remedy as available in law.

¶25

The writ petition is disposed of.

¶26

CM APPL. 21598/2024

¶27

Dismissed as infructuous.

¶28

V. KAMESWAR RAO, J

¶29

SAURABH BANERJEE, J

¶30

APRIL 10, 2024 /aky

¶31

L/Insp/Exe Pushpanjli Kumari v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

L/Insp/Exe Pushpanjli Kumari v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Susheel Jain Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 27, Delhi & Anr.

Susheel Jain Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 27, Delhi & Anr.

Mamta Agarwal Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Central Circle) 28 Delhi & Anr.

Smt. Preeti Gupta Vs Acit Central CIRCLE-25 Delhi

Mohan Chauhan Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Dulal Ghosh & Ors. Vs Mother Diary Fruit and Vegetable Private Limited

Salim Ahmed Vs Talagang Co-Operative Group Housingh Society and Anr.

M Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi & Anr.

Dr. Divya Arora Vs Union of India and Ors.

Umeshwar Prasad Vs Union of India & Anr.

Ganapa Kalyan Kumar Vs Indian Coast Guard & Ors.

Jitendra Kumar Mandal Vs Union of India & Ors.

Pankaj Mahajan Vs Union of India & Ors.

Deepti Awasthi Vs Union of India & Anr.