Writ petition seeking enforcement of an order dated 07.07.2023; the court held a writ is not a remedy for enforcing court orders, and dismissed the petition as withdrawn with liberty to pursue appropriate legal steps.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~72
RAVINDER SINGH JHELUMI ..... Petitioner
Through:
versus
ZEENY JHELUMI & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Harsh Chauhan, Advocate for R- 2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
CM APPL. 2294/2024 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
W.P.(C) 504/2024
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
JANUARY 12, 2024 sc
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/05/2024 at 12:28:43
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/05/2024 at 12:28:43
Ravinder Singh Jhelumi
Zeeny Jhelumi
Subramonium Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
