Petition under Articles 226/227 challenging a CAT order directing consideration of subsistence allowance during the respondent's suspension. The respondent stood exonerated in departmental proceedings and his suspension was revoked, leaving no ground for interference.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
versus
BABU LAL YADAV ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Anil Singh, Adv. (VC)
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR O R D E R % 05.02.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 01:38:37
petitioners to consider the case of the respondent for grant of subsistence allowance during the period of his suspension which suspension, now admittedly stands revoked.
REKHA PALLI, J
RAJNISH BHATNAGAR, J
FEBRUARY 5, 2024 acm
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 01:38:37
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Union of India and Anr.
Babu Lal Yadav
Rekha Palli
Rajnish Bhatnagar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
