Condonation of a four-day delay in filing a review petition was allowed; the review petition seeking review of an order dated 01 July 2024 was dismissed for want of any cogent ground or error apparent on the face of the record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~SB-2
versus
GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sandeep Prabhakar, Mr. Amit Kumar and Mr. Vikas Mehta, Advocates for BSES/R-2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
% 13.09.2024
CM APPL. 53880/2024
REVIEW PET. 333/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/09/2024 at 11:54:57
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
SEPTEMBER 13, 2024 kct
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/09/2024 at 11:54:57
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the review petition should be condoned.
Whether there is any ground to review the order dated 01.07.2024.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R.K. Choudhary (Raj Kumar Choudhary)
Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi
Tushar Rao Gedela
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
