The Single Judge Bench disposed of the writ petition filed by MOL Corporation as the grievance was substantially attended to, permitting further appropriate proceedings if sought.
The writ petition is disposed of without further order, reserving rights to institute appropriate proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
MOL CORPORATION ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Nageswar Rao, Mr. Parth and Mr. Aman Rewaria, Advocates.
versus
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Asheesh Jain, CGSC with Mr. Ishank Jha, Advocate Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Puneet Singhal, Standing Counsel.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA O R D E R % 01.07.2024
Mr. Rao, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that since the grievance of the writ petitioner has been substantially attended to and addressed, the writ petition may be disposed of subject to rights being reserved to institute appropriate proceedings, if so chosen and advised.
Ordered accordingly.
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J.
JULY 01, 2024 / vp
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/07/2024 at 14:22:29
MOL CORPORATION
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ORS.
Yashwant Varma
Ravinder Dudeja
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
