Petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition to file a fresh petition with proper averments; the writ petition and connected application were dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~67
..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Singh, Adv.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, CGSC with Mr. Srish Kumar Mishra, Mr. Alexander Mathai Paikaday, Mr. Krishnan V., Mr. Lakshay Gunawat and Mr. Rishav Dubey, Advs. for UOI
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner states, he intends to withdraw the writ petition and file a fresh petition with proper averments. The writ petition and connected application are dismissed as withdrawn.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
SAURABH BANERJEE, J
APRIL 3, 2024 /aky
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/04/2024 at 12:30:13
WING COMMANDER PUSHPA THAKUR 27066-A
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
V. KAMESWAR RAO
SAURABH BANERJEE
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
