Petitioners, having returned to India and willing to appear before the District Medical Board under the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act 2021, sought withdrawal of their writ petition as infructuous. The court allowed the withdrawal application and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~74
SIDDHARTH PANDEY & ANR. .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Nalin Tripathi, Advocate.
versus
THE DISTRICT MEDICAL BOARD & ANR. .....Respondents Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R
% 06.11.2024 CM APPL. 64857/2024 (for withdrawal of writ petition)
W.P.(C) 4696/2024
SANJEEV NARULA, J
NOVEMBER 6, 2024/ nk
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 02:43:35
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Siddharth Pandey & Anr.
The District Medical Board
Anr.
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
