The writ petition was dismissed as the petitioner could not be located. The petitioner was found to have grossly misused Article 226 of the Constitution of India, leading to the closure of proceedings.
The petition was disposed of along with pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~20
Through: Mr.G.D.Sharma and Mr.Yashvir Singh, Advs.
versus
NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS.
.....Respondents Through: Mr.Mohit Bhardwaj, Adv for Delhi Police.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 09:14:46
be located.
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
SEPTEMBER 12, 2024/MJ
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 09:14:46
Anil
North Delhi Municipal Corporation
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
