show the source of cash transaction of such a hefty amount allegedly given as a loan, no details of cash as on 29.01.2016, have been furnished. He had additionally done two similar transactions of Rs.50,00,000/- each on the same day with Mr. Naresh Hemrajani and Mr. Avinash K. Browne respectively, which shows the falsity of the claim of the Plaintiff. He has prepared and fabricated a Promissory Note, which is unstamped and against the mandate of the Stamp Act and is not admissible in evidence. 17. The alleged amount of Rs.50,00,000/- in cash is an unaccounted income and no ITR has been filed nor any explanation offered by the Plaintiff. Further, reference has been made to Section 271D and Section 269 SS of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and the penalty for contravention of the Section 271 D of the Income Tax Act, 1961 . The Defendants have served a Letter dated 14.06.2019 to Income-Tax Authorities. A Letter dated 14.06.2019 to SHO, Hauz Khas and another Letter to Prime Minister Office. 18. The Defendant has also filed an Application under Section 156 (3) of Cr.P.C. against the Plaintiff, which is pending adjudication. 19. The Defendant has claimed that the cheque was issued in 2016, which have been misused by the Plaintiff in 2019 and the entire case is based on concocted facts. The Plaint suffers from vagueness and ambiguities with regard to the source of amount. The present Suit is nothing but an abuse of the Civil and Criminal machinery of the Court. It is asserted that there are various triable issues, which have been raised in the present Application and the Defendant is entitled to Leave to Defend the Suit.
