This Court disposed of a writ petition challenging a redeployment order. It directed the respondents to treat the petition as a representation and decide it within four weeks, maintaining the existing status quo.
Petition treated as representation; respondents to decide within four weeks; interim status quo order subsisting.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~44
..... Petitioner
Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba and Mr. Tanmay Cheema, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
..... Respondent Through: Ms. Avshreya Pratap Singh Rudy, Sr.P.C. with Ms. Usha Jamnal, Adv. for UOI
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE O R D E R % 01.04.2024
prayers:-
“(i) Issue a writ of certiorari for quashing the office order dated 15.03.2024 issued by the respondents whereby the petitioner has been re-deployed as Tech-I/AC;
(ii) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to redeploy the petitioner in Ministerial Cadre of Railway Protection Force or in any other suitable department commensurate with medical condition of petitioner such as Commercial, Medical, Personnel etc.;
(iii) Pass any such others orders as it may deem fit to this Hon’ble Court in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/04/2024 at 12:01:27
posting of the petitioner i.e., Assistant Sub-Inspector.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
SAURABH BANERJEE, J
APRIL 1, 2024 /ds
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/04/2024 at 12:01:27
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be treated as a representation to be decided by the competent authority instead of being adjudicated by this Court.
MAHIPAL SINGH
UNION OF INDIA
V. KAMESWAR RAO
SAURABH BANERJEE
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
