Petitioner sought admission for LLM but erroneously entered an LLB subject code. Respondent issued a correct admit card. Petitioner withdrew the writ petition.
Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~86
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NIRAJ KUMAR
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Abhay Kumar, Adv.
versus
COMMON UNIVERSITY ENTRANCE TEST THROUGH ITS DIRECTORS & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nidhi Mittal, Adv. with Mr. Apoorv Kurup and Ms. Aanchal Dubey, Advs. for R-2
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
%
O R D E R (O R A L) 19.03.2024
1. The petitioner in this writ petition erroneously entered the subject code of the LLM entrance examinations to be undertaken by him, in his application form, as COQP 11 instead of COQP 14.
2. COQP 11 was a code which applied for LLB entrance examinations and not for LLM entrance examinations.
3. According to the averments in the petition, the petitioner wrote to the respondents on several occasions drawing attention to the inadvertent error committed by him and praying that he may be permitted to rectify the error and an admit card reflecting the correct subject code be issued to him.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed By:AJITW.P.(C) 4179/2024 KUMAR Signing Da te:2 0.03.2024 15:47:37
Page 1 of 2
4. As the admit card which was issued to the petitioner reflected the erroneous subject code of COQP 11 instead of COQP 14, the petitioner has instituted the present writ petition before this Court.
5. Ms. Nidhi Mittal, learned Counsel for the NTA, submits that the petitioner’s grievance has been redressed by the respondents as they have issued a fresh admit card bearing the correct subject code COQP 14. The admit card has been handed over to Mr. Abhay Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioner in court.
6. Mr. Abhay Kumar, therefore, submits that his client’s grievance stands redressed. He, accordingly, seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition.
7. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
MARCH 19, 2024 dsn
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed By:AJITW.P.(C) 4179/2024 KUMAR Signing Da te:2 0.03.2024 15:47:37
Page 2 of 2
Niraj Kumar
Common University Entrance Test through its Directors & Anr.
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
