The High Court of Delhi dismissed the petitioner's writ petition in default for non-prosecution. Although the court initially considered allowing the petition based on a similar precedent, the petitioner's continued absence rendered the order of dismissal unsustainable.
None. The writ petition was dismissed in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~64
SAMPURAN KUMAR CHAURASIYA .....Petitioner
GOVT. OF INDIA & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Bhagwan Swarup Shukla, CGSC
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR
O R D E R % 12.09.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 08:20:05
In these circumstances, we dismiss the writ petition in default and for nonprosecution in itself.
REKHA PALLI, J
SHALINDER KAUR, J
SEPTEMBER 12, 2024 SU
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 08:20:05
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the warrants to dismiss the writ petition due to non-appearance of the petitioner constitute a proper exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Jai Pal vs. Union of India and Ors.Referred¶1
W.P.(C) 665/2012 dated 14.08.2024
SAMPURAN KUMAR CHAURASIYA
GOVT. OF INDIA
REKHA PALLI
SHALINDER KAUR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
