Petition against Delhi Development Authority; counsel sought leave to withdraw and DDA raised no objection. The High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, along with the pending application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~61
LAKSHMI ANAND PRAKASH THROUGH HER ATTORNEY SAURABH PRAKASH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Utsav Jain, Advocate (M:8527214201)
versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. .... Respondents Through: Ms. Shahana Farah, Ms. Sanna Harta, Advocates for DDA(M:9810006902)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
O R D E R % 02.04.2024
MINI PUSHKARNA, J
APRIL 2, 2024 au
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/04/2024 at 12:07:42
Lakshmi Anand Prakash through her attorney Saurabh Prakash
Delhi Development Authority
Mini Pushkarna
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
