The petitioner failed to appear on the second call of the writ petition. The court dismissed the petition and the pending application for non-prosecution due to non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~60
Through: None.
versus
BSES YAMUNA POWER LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Moksh Arora, Mr. Santosh Ramdurg and Mr. Rehan Verma, Advs.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R % 22.08.2024
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
AUGUST 22, 2024 p’ma
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/08/2024 at 14:00:49
Zahiruddin
BSES Yamuna Power Limited
Purushindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
