Writ petition concerning a dispute with the MCD was converted into a representation; the petitioner was directed to appear before the concerned Assistant Engineer, who was to pass a speaking order within four weeks after hearing him.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI (THROUGH COMMISSIONER) & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Pritish Sabharwal, Adv. for MCD (through v/c) Mr. DivyamNandrajg, Panel Counsel and Mr. Jatin Dua, Adv. for R-2 and 3.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA O R D E R % 10.04.2024
SACHIN DATTA, J
APRIL 10, 2024/ cl
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2024 at 12:09:16
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's grievance against MCD should be addressed by way of a speaking order on his representation.
Kamal Ratawal
Municipal Corporation of Delhi (through Commissioner)
Respondent No. 2
Respondent No. 3
Sachin Datta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
