Revision petition challenging a trial court order permitting the defendant to seek an electricity connection in her name without the owner's NOC. The court found no illegality or perversity in the impugned order, noted the connection had already been installed, and disposed of the revision petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
KULDEEP SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rishab Raj Jain, Standing Counsel and Mr. Suryansh Shukla, Advs. for BSES RPL.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA
O R D E R % 23.01.2024
DHARMESH SHARMA, J
JANUARY 23, 2024/ck
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/06/2024 at 15:04:45
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial court's order permitting a fresh application for an electricity connection without an NOC from the owner was illegal or perverse?
Neetu Gulati
Kuldeep Singh
Dharmesh Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
