Mahesh Kumar Prajapati v. Municipal Corporation Delhi
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Delhi dismissed the petitioners' prayer directing allotment of tehbazari sites, stating that entitlement depends on future vending plans and survey participation. It refused a blanket order to not disturb vendors, clarifying fixed-place vending rights for CoV holders are limited to thirty minutes.
What did the court decide?
The prayer for allotment of sites is rejected; petitioners are directed to participate in the survey. The prayer to not disturb vending activities is not granted in a blanket manner due to CoV terms.
What the court decided
$~4
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(C) 3719/2023
MAHESH KUMAR PRAJAPATI & ORS. ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. Kaoliangpou Kamei, Adv.
Versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Puja Kalra, Adv. SI Joginder Singh, Parvi Officer, Traffic
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
O R D E R
%
05.03.2024
- The petitioners (four in number) have filed the present petition, inter alia, praying as under:
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the court should direct the respondent to allot tehbazari sites to the petitioners as prayed in the petition.
Whether the petitioners are entitled to carry on vending activities from a fixed place given their lack of allotted sites.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MAHESH KUMAR PRAJAPATI & ORS.
- respondent
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION DELHI
Coram
VIBHU BAKHRU
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court