Petition challenging illegal reconstruction granted no substantive adjudication; registered as representation requiring municipal corporation to grant hearing within six weeks.
MCD to grant hearing to petitioners and pass reasoned order within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~76
AJAY KUMAR CHAURASIA & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Himanshu Anand, Adv. alongwith Ms. Dharini Windlass and Mr. Parmod Kumar, Advs.
versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS.
..... Respondents
Mr. Mohit Bhardwaj, Adv. for R-3 i.e. SHO, PS Desh Bandhu Gupta, Delhi. Ms. Hina Rajput, Advs. for R-4 and 5 (through VC)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA O R D E R % 05.03.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/03/2024 at 11:30:55
present petition. It is directed accordingly.
SACHIN DATTA, J
MARCH 5, 2024/r
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/03/2024 at 11:30:55
AJAY KUMAR CHAURASIA & ANR.
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS.
SACHIN DATTA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
