The petitioner sought liberty to withdraw the writ petition before the Delhi High Court to re-file it before the Central Administrative Tribunal. The court permitted the withdrawal with liberty to approach the Tribunal.
Permission granted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file the same before the Central Administrative Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~73
Through: Mr. Palash S Singhai, Advocate
versus
UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ANR
..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Ravinder Agarwal and Mr. Lekh Raj Singh, Advocates for R-1/UPSC. Ms. Avshverya Pratap Singh Rudy, SPC with Mr. Shriram Tiwary, Ms. Usha Jamnal, Nitin Agnihotri and Mr. Salman Razi, Advocates for R-2/UOI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
O R D E R % 05.03.2024
(The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid Mode)
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/03/2024 at 11:41:01
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
MARCH 5, 2024 Aj
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/03/2024 at 11:41:01
Piyush Anand
Union Public Service Commission
Tushar Rao Gedela
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
