Disposed

Md. Nasimuddin Ansari v. Union of India and Ors.

Delhi HC5 Mar 2024W.P.(C)/3333/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition regarding non-functional upgradation by closing it in light of pending contempt proceedings seeking identical relief. The court refused to adjudicate on the grant of benefits and granted liberty to challenge a specific letter post-contempt proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Exemption allowed subject to exceptions; petition closed with liberty to challenge the impugned letter post-contempt proceedings; no opinion expressed on grant of NFU.

Md. Nasimuddin Ansari Vs Union of India and Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~59

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(C) 3333/2024 MD. NASIMUDDIN ANSARI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Tapas Das, Advocate

¶4

versus

¶5

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Shubhra Parashar with Mr. Virender Pratap Singh Charak and Mr. Deepesh Chaudhary, Advocates with Mr. Ram Niwas, Subedar for UOI

¶6

CORAM:

¶7

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE

¶8

O R D E R % 05.03.2024 CM APPL. 13746/2024 (exemption)

¶9

Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.

¶10

Application is disposed of.

¶11

W.P.(C) 3333/2024

¶12

This petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:

¶13

A. quash the letter No. 16800/RPSN/2114K/MNA/09/E1D dated 21.02.2022 on the ground that the representation of the petitioner dated 13.01.2022 disposed of illegally and cryptically since the disposal has remained an obscure affair since no reasons have been recorded leading to the demonstration of disclosure of mind so applied while disposing of the representation because of rejection of upgrdation of part ACR from 18.09.2000 to 31.03.2001 the Petitioner (now Retd.) will be deprived of NFU w.e.f. 01.07.2006 ;

¶14

B. issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate Writ Order or directions directing the respondents to grant the

¶15

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/03/2024 at 11:29:23

¶16

benefit of non-functional upgradation with effect from the date of 01.04.2006 along with consequential benefits by holding a review meeting of Screening Committee; pass any other or further orders or directions in favour of the petitioner and against the respondents as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper.

¶17

During the course of hearing, we have been informed that a contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner for non-compliance of order dated September 20, 2019 in CM APPL. 41040/2019 in W.P. (C) 11767/2016 wherein the petitioner’s primary relief for grant of consequential benefits were granted by the Court.

¶18

Even during the course of hearing, Mr. Das would submit that the prayer for grant of NFU w.e.f. July 1, 2006 is in terms of the order passed by the Court in the aforesaid CM APPL. 41040/2019. 4. If that be so as the petitioner has already filed a contempt petition where he is seeking identical prayer i.e. for grant of NFU as a consequential benefit granted by the Court, we close this petition, by granting liberty to the petitioner to challenge the letter dated February 21, 2022 after the culmination of the contempt proceedings initiated by the petitioner and also if any cause survives for the petitioner in respect of grant of NFU.

¶19

It is made clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the issue of grant of NFU to the petitioner w.e.f. July 1, 2006.

¶20

The petition is disposed of.

¶21

V. KAMESWAR RAO, J

¶22

SAURABH BANERJEE, J

¶23

MARCH 5, 2024/akr..

¶24

This is a digitally signed order.

¶25

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/03/2024 at 11:29:23

Md. Nasimuddin Ansari v. Union of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Nasimuddin Ansari v. Union of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Susheel Jain Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 27, Delhi & Anr.

Devi Lal Choudhary Vs Union of India & Anr.

Nettel Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs the Commissioner of Police & Anr.

Amar Enterprises through Its Proprietor Vs Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax and Anr.

Pooja Sharma Vs the Registrar General High Court of Delhi and Ors.

Pankaj Dhiman Vs the Registrar General High Court of Delhi and Ors.

Susheel Jain Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 27, Delhi & Anr.

East Delhi Municipal Corporation Vs Sandeep Goyal and Anr.

Devi Lal Choudhary Vs Union of India & Anr.

Vijay Singh Yadav Vs Union of India and Another

Sh K R Mann Retired as Librarian & Ors. Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Vijendra Kumar Vs Union of India & Ors.

Roshindra Kumar Vs Union of India and Anr.

Ex.Gnr. Brijender Singh Chauhan Vs Union of India & Ors.