Disposed

Maa Santoshi Pvt. Iti & Anr. v. Directorate General of Training & Anr.

Delhi HC16 Apr 2024W.P.(C)/3260/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed Respondent 2 to respond to the DGT's email regarding the NOC for establishing a Multi Skill Training Institute in Bihar. The court fixed a timeline for Respondent 2's response and for the DGT to process the application upon receipt, allowing petitioners to seek legal remedies if grievances persist.

What did the court decide?

Respondent 2 directed to convey response to DGT within two weeks; DGT to take decision within two weeks of such response.

Maa Santoshi Pvt. Iti & Anr. Vs Directorate General of… — Service and Employment | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~165

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 3260/2024

¶4

MAA SANTOSHI PVT ITI & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Ms. Priti Kumari and Mr. Mrinal Kishor, Advs.

¶5

versus

¶6

DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF TRAINING & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nidhi Banga and Mr. Nishant Kumar, Advs. for R-1 None for R-2

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR

¶8

¶9

JUDGMENT (ORAL) 16.04.2024

¶10

W.P.(C) 3260/2024

¶11

1. On 1 October 2019, the petitioners submitted an application to the Directorate General of Training (DGT), seeking permission for establishing a Multi Skill Training Institute (MSTI) in Northern Block, Bihar treating it as unserved block¹ . The petitioners sought affiliation for four units in the Electrician trade and four units in the Fitter trade from the academic session 2024-2024.

¶12

2. The DGT has, in its communication to the petitioners, stated that the processing of the petitioners’ application could be taken up only after NOC was obtained from the Directorate of Employment and Training, Bihar, impleaded as Respondent 2 herein. Ms. Banga, who

¶13

Signature Not Verified

¶14

Signature Not Verified

¶15

Digitally Signed By:CHANDRASHEKHAR AN HARI SHANKAR Signing Da te:18 .04.2024 15:15

¶16

Digitally Signed WP (C) 3260/2024 By:AJIT KUMAR Signing Date:18.0 4.20 24 15:16

¶17

Page 1 of 3

¶18

appears for the DGT, submits on instructions that once a verification report from the Directorate of Employment and Training is received, the DGT would proceed to inspect the petitioners’ premises and process the petitioners’ application with all due expedition.

¶19

3. Despite issuance of notice and despite this matter being listed on several occasions, there is no response from Respondent 2.

¶20

4. The DGT has, on 9 January 2024, reminded the State Directorate, Bihar (Respondent 2) to intimate as to whether it was willing to issue an NOC for the petitioners so that a joint inspection of the petitioners institute could be undertaken thereafter.

¶21

5. In these circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of within the following terms:

¶22

(i) Respondent 2 is directed to positively convey a response to the email dated 9 January 2024 addressed by the DGT (Respondent 1) as to whether it has no objection to the grant of affiliation to the petitioners, for four units in the Electrician trade and four units for the Fitter trade from the academic session 2024-2025.

¶23

(ii) This decision will positively be taken within two weeks and communicated forthwith to the petitioners as well as to the DGT.

¶24

(iii) Immediately on receipt of the said communication, the

¶25

1 A Block in which there is no other Industrial Training Institute (ITI)

¶26

Signature Not Ver ified

¶27

Signature Not Verified

¶28

Digitally Signed Page 2 of 3 By:CHANDRASHEKHAR AN HARI SHANKAR Signing Da te:18 .04.2024 15:15

¶29

Digitally Signed WP (C) 3260/2024 By:AJIT KUMAR Signing Date:18.0 4.20 24 15:16

¶30

DGT would proceed to process the petitioners’ application and take a decision thereon within two weeks thereof. The said decision would also be communicated to the petitioners as soon as it is taken.

¶31

(iv) Should any grievance continue to survive, the petitioners would be at liberty to seek remedies as are available in law.

¶32

(v) In case any further information or documents are required from the petitioners either by Respondent 1 or Respondent 2, they would immediately call upon the petitioners to provide the said information, which the petitioners would also provide as soon as it is sought.

¶33

C.HARI SHANKAR, J

¶34

APRIL 16, 2024 rb

¶35

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶36

Signature Not Verified

¶37

Signature Not Verified

¶38

Digitally Signed By:CHANDRASHEKHAR AN HARI SHANKAR Signing Da te:18 .04.2024 15:15

¶39

Digitally Signed WP (C) 3260/2024 By:AJIT KUMAR Signing Date:18.0 4.20 24 15:16

¶40

Page 3 of 3

Maa Santoshi Pvt. Iti & Anr. v. Directorate General of Training & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Maa Santoshi Pvt. Iti & Anr. v. Directorate General of Training & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors. Vs Harish Chander Sharma

Harvinder Singh Vs Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Govrnment of India and

Ajit Sarin Vs New Delhi Municipal Council and Anr.

Priya Sarin and Anr. Vs New Delhi Municipal Council and Anr.

Qaisar Sultana (Sr. Citizen) and Ors. Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.

Br College of Education & Anr. Vs National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

Sanskriti College of Education & Anr. Vs National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

Pt. Deendayal Dangrolia Shiksha Prasar Samiti Vs National Council for Teacher Education and Anr.

Mother Dairy Fruit and Vegetable Pvt. Ltd. Vs Sh. Hukam Singh

Mohit Dabas & Anr. Vs the Principal Indraprastha World School & Ors.

Balwan Singh and Another Vs Union of India and Others

Rewant Ahlawat Vs Central Board of Secondary Education

Sachin Sharma Vs Richa Sharma

Janata Shikshan Prasarak Mandals Womens B.Ed. College & Anr. Vs National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.