This order is a non-speaking disposal. As the provisional release of the consignment was permitted during the pendency of the petition, the lawyer submitted the prayer as infructuous, and the court disposed of the writ petition as not pressed. No substantive legal issue was decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~9
versus
ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL, DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Anurag Ojha, SSC with Mr. Subham Kumar, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA O R D E R
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J
MARCH 5, 2024/ vp
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/03/2024 at 11:38:51
M/S. RNK INTERNATIONAL
ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL, DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE & ORS.
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
RAVINDER DUDEJA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
