Disposed

Vijay Uppal & Anr. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Delhi HC1 Mar 2024W.P.(C)/3105/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition seeking mandamus directing authorities to demarcate the petitioners' 12 Bighas of land in Village Fatehpur Beri after verifying title and revenue records, plus compensation for failure to act. Respondents accepted notice, admitted delay, and sought two months; the court disposed of the petition directing completion of demarcation within two months.

What did the court decide?

Demarcation of petitioners' land directed to be completed within two months; report to be furnished to petitioners within two weeks of completion.

Vijay Uppal & Anr. Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors. — Land Acquisition | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~71

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

% Judgment delivered on: 01.03.2024

¶4

- W.P.(C) 3105/2024 VIJAY UPPAL & ANR. ..... Petitioners

¶5

versus

¶6

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents

¶7

Advocates who appeared in this case:

¶8

For the Petitioners : Mr. Sumit Gahlawat, Mr. T.S. Thakran and Mr. Rukun, Advocates. For the Respondents : Mr. Arjun Basra, Advocate for Ms. Hetu Arora Sethi, ASC for GNCTD.

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA

¶11

JUDGMENT

¶12

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J. (ORAL)

¶13

[ The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid mode ]

¶14

CM APPL. 12771/2024 (for exemption)

¶15

Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.

¶16

The application stands disposed of.

¶17

W.P.(C) 3105/2024

¶18

This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of

¶19

India, 1950, inter alia , seeking the following reliefs:-

¶20

“(a) Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other, appropriate Writ, order or direction thereby directing the respondents to demarcate the said land of petitioners [total admeasuring 12 Bighas (Khasras Nos. 1164 min (5-09), 1165 min (4-2) & 1642/1166 min (2-09)] situated in the revenue estate of Village Fatehpur Beri, Tehsil

¶21

Signature Not Verified

¶22

Digitally Signed By:VINOD KUMAR Signing Da te:0 4.03.2024 18:30:40

¶23

W.P.(C) 3105/2024

¶24

Page 1 of 2

¶25

Mehrauli. District South, Delhi in as per the procedure prescribed in Law after verification of the petitioners' said land and the chain of title documents and as per the revenue records, after prior intimation to petitioners and in their presence and with their participation;

¶26

(b) Pass an order directing the respondents to give compensation to the petitioners for failing to carry out its Constitutional and statutory obligations/duties, resulting In the violation of the fundamental rights of the petitioners;

¶27

(c) For issuance of any other writ, order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case;

¶28

(d) Serving of advance notices upon the respondent No, 1 to 3 may kindly be dispensed with;”

¶29

Issue notice.

¶30

Notice is accepted by Mr. Arjun Basra, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and submits that inadvertently there has been a delay in getting the demarcation conducted.

¶31

He seeks two months time to complete the demarcation.

¶32

In view of the aforesaid statement, Mr. Basra, learned counsel for the respondents, the petition along with all the applications is disposed of with direction that the prayer, as sought for demarcation of the land of the petitioner, shall be completed within a period of two months from today.

¶33

The report thereof, shall be furnished to the petitioner within two weeks from the date of completion of such demarcation.

¶34

The petition along with pending applications is disposed of in the above terms.

¶35

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J

¶36

MARCH 1, 2024 nd

¶37

Signature Not Verified

¶38

Digitally Signed By:VINOD KUMAR Signing Da te:0 4.03.2024 18:30:40

¶39

W.P.(C) 3105/2024

¶40

Page 2 of 2

Vijay Uppal & Anr. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Uppal & Anr. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shadab Rahmani Vs National Medical Commission and Ors.

Mohammad Hakim and Anr. Vs Delhi Development Authority

Mol Corporation Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors.

Union of India & Anr. Vs Anurag Sharma

Susheel Jain Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 27, Delhi & Anr.

Devi Lal Choudhary Vs Union of India & Anr.

Nettel Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs the Commissioner of Police & Anr.

Amar Enterprises through Its Proprietor Vs Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax and Anr.

Adarsh Enclave Residents Welfare Association (Regd) Vs Government of NCT of Delhi

Devki Devi Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Pooja Jha Vs Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Dr Sonali Badhe Vs Union of India and Ors.

Shomi Verma & Ors. Vs Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (Hq) & Ors.

Supervisors Union B.H.E.L. Vs UOI & Ors.