Order disposing of a writ petition regarding street vending. Court accepted respondent's assurance that a street vendor would be considered in the survey but refused interim permission to continue vending pending determination of the vendor's status by authorities.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~42
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PREMA SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Bibhuti Bhushan Mishra, Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Mishra, Ms. Renu, Mr. Aditya and Mr. Kailash, Advs.
versus
NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Chetanya Singh, Adv. for NDMC. Mr. Divyam Nandrajog, Panel Counsel, GNCTD with Mr. Jatin Dua, Adv. for R-3.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
O R D E R % 09.01.2024
“I. For an order directing the officials of the NDMC as well as Delhi Police to allow the Petitioner to peacefully vend at her vending spot i.e besides shop no. 96, Mother Dairy Chowk, Sarojini Nagar, Delhi.
II. That the petitioner be included in the survey which the Town Vending Committee (TVC) of the NDMC area is going to conduct in the Sarojini Nagar Market in accordance with the provisions of THE STREET VENDORS (PROTECTION OF LIVELIHOOD AND REGULATION OF STREET VENDING) ACT, 2014 at the same spot
W.P.(C) 283/2024
page 1 of 3
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/05/2024 at 12:29:47
where the petitioner has been vending since the year 2011 and the details of which have been mentioned in para 5 of the Petition.
III. pass an order directing the respondents to consider and pass appropriate orders on the representations made by the Petitioner to the concerned authorities after giving opportunity of being heard to the petitioner.”
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/05/2024 at 12:29:47
whether she has been vending at the given site is required to be determined by the concerned authority.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
JANUARY 9, 2024/r
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
W.P.(C) 283/2024 page 3 of 3
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/05/2024 at 12:29:47
Prema Singh
New Delhi Municipal Council
Vibhu Bakhru
Tara Vitasta Ganju
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
