Petitioner sought to withdraw writ petition as all prayers were resolved. Respondent opposed none. Court dismissed petition and pending application as withdrawn.
Petition and pending application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13
PROF. RAJENDRA P. KUNDU ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Shrutanjaya Bhardwaj, Advocate.
versus
JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Kushal and Mr. Subhrodeep Saha, Advocates for Ms. Monika Arora, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
O R D E R % 12.01.2024
(The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid Mode)
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
JANUARY 12, 2024/ nd
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 01:05:47
Prof. Rajendra P. Kundu
Jawaharlal Nehru University
Tushar Rao Gedula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
