Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition, which was granted by the single judge.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition was granted; the writ petition is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~41
ISHIKA VARDHAMAN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Avinash Shukla, Adv.
versus
UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohiner J. S. Rupal, Mr. Hardik Rupal, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
%
O R D E R 29.01.2024
1. Mr. Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the University of Delhi has itself assuaged the grievance of the petitioner and that, therefore, the grievance does not survive for consideration.
2. He, therefore, prays for permission to withdraw the writ petition.
3. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
C. HARI SHANKAR, J
JANUARY 29, 2024 ab
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 00:03:52
Ishika Vardhman
University of Delhi
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
