Petition sought mutation of a Ramesh Nagar property in the petitioners' names and its conversion from leasehold to freehold. Respondent stated mutation was already done. Court granted liberty to seek conversion through appropriate proceedings and disposed of the petition with pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~25
versus
LAND AND DEVELOPMENT OFFICER ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Gogna, CGSC with Ms. Priya Singh, Advocate.
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/03/2024 at 11:32:11
leasehold to freehold in accordance with law.
DR. SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J
FEBRUARY 23, 2024 N
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/03/2024 at 11:32:11
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent should mutate the Ramesh Nagar property in the petitioners' names and convert it from leasehold to freehold.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajiv Nayar & Anr
Land and Development Officer
Sudhir Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
