The High Court of Delhi disposed of a writ petition by directing the respondents to treat the petitioner's application as a representation for considersmanship for the grant of invalid pension within eight weeks.
Riders to consider the petition as a representation for grant of invalid pension within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~61
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SURENDER
..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhay Kumar Bhargava and Mr. Satyaarth Sinha, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
..... Respondents Through: Mr. Niraj Kumar, Sr. Central Govt. Counsel for UOI
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
O R D E R % 15.02.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/12/2024 at 15:44:28
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
SAURABH BANERJEE, J
FEBRUARY 15, 2024 /ds
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/12/2024 at 15:44:28
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the grant of invalid pension should be initiated by way of a writ petition or treated as a representation.
SURENDER
UNION OF INDIA
V. KAMESWAR RAO
SAURABH BANERJEE
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
