Allowed

Kuldeep Singh v. MCD and Anr.

Delhi HC1 Apr 2024W.P.(C)/2174/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petitioner, a street vendor, sought protection from disturbance and issuance of a stop-gap Certificate of Vending (COV) due to technical delays in survey data linkage. The Court directed the Municipal Corporation of Delhi to issue the COV as a stop-gap arrangement while denying allocation of a fixed site.

What did the court decide?

Directed MCD to issue a stop-gap Certificate of Vending; petitioners not to be disturbed from vending activities if conditions are met.

Kuldeep Singh Vs MCD and Anr. — Service and Employment | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~32

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(C) 2174/2023 CM APPL. 8266/2023 CM APPL. 8267/2023 CM APPL. 21474/2023

¶4

KULDEEP SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. N.K Sahoo, Advocate

¶5

versus

¶6

MCD AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Puja Kalra, Standing Counsel with Mr. Virendra Singh, Advocate for MCD

¶7

Mr. Divyam Nandrajog, Panel Counsel, GNCTD with Ms. Surbhi Soni, Advocate for R-3

¶8

Ms. Urvi Mohan, Advocate for GNCTD/Delhi Police

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

¶11

O R D E R % 01.04.2024

¶12

The petitioner has filed the present petition inter alia praying as under:

¶13

“(I) To issue a writ of mandamus or appropriate writ or direction or order directing the respondent not to disturb the petitioner for squatting in front of :- Shop/building No 38-E, Kamala Nagar Ps Roop Nagar, Delhi-7 till Section 21 of street vendors Act ,2014 being enforced and vending fees being collected under section 8 of the street vendors Act,2014;

¶14

(II) To issue a writ of mandamus or appropriate writ or direction or order directing the respondent not to disturb the petitioner for squatting in front of :- Shop/Building No 38-E, Kamala Nagar Ps Roop Nagar in

¶15

This is a digitally signed order.

¶16

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/04/2024 at 12:33:07

¶17

compliance of order dated 10.11.2021 passed in Writ Petition No 12605/2021;”

¶18

The petitioner has also filed an application [CM APPL. 21474/2023] seeking to modify the prayers sought in the petition to read as under:

¶19

“To issue a writ of mandamus or appropriate writ or direction or order directing the respondent No 1 to issue the Certificate Of Vending (COV) vide URI ID No 6631136.”

¶20

The petitioner claims that he had participated in the survey conducted by the Town Vending Committee (TVC) in the year 2021, however, a Certificate of Vending (COV) has not been issued.

¶21

The learned counsel appearing for the MCD submits that there is some delay in issuing COV on account of technical reasons for linking the aadhaar card of the street vendors with the biometric authentication for the purpose of survey. However, it is not disputed that pending resolution of this technical issue, COV has been issued by the MCD to various other vendors.

¶22

The learned counsel for the MCD submits that the same has been issued as the stop gap arrangement till a further survey is conducted and the identity of the street vendors is linked to the aadhaar card.

¶23

In view of the above, we find no reason why a similar certificate as a stop gap arrangement not be issued to the petitioner. We, accordingly, direct the MCD to take necessary steps to do so.

¶24

Admittedly, no Tehbazari site has been allocated to the petitioner, therefore, the petitioner would not be permitted to vend at a fixed place. However, if the petitioner complies with all the conditions of the COV that may be issued, the petitioner would not be disturbed from carrying on the vending activities.

¶25

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/04/2024 at 12:33:07

¶26

The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. All pending applications stand closed.

¶27

VIBHU BAKHRU, J

¶28

TARA VITASTA GANJU, J APRIL 01, 2024 g.joshi

¶29

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶30

Kuldeep Singh v. MCD and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kuldeep Singh v. MCD and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Management of Moolchand Khairati Ram Hospital and Ayurvedic Research Institute Vs Sardaram Bhati

Kaushal Sangwan Vs Director General of Audit (Infrastructure), Delhi and Anr.

Mr. Gurmeet Singh Grewal & Ors. Vs Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.

Zomi Students Federation Vs Union Public Service Commission & Ors.

M/S Blue Moon Cafe Vs Deputy Commissioner of Police & Ors.

Kamlesh Sharma Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Karamvir Singh Vs Government of NCT Delhi and Ors.

Sh. Kulbhushan Kumar Vs Salwan Boys Sr. Sec. School and Anr.

Tula Ram and Ors. Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.

M/S Uv Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. Vs M/S Unified Vision Capital Ltd. & Ors.

Mohd Shahnawaz and Anr. Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Naveen Kumar Vs Muncipal Corporation Delhi Adn Anr.

Vicky and Anr. Vs Muncipal Corporation Delhi and Anr.

Raj Kumar Vs Muncipal Corporation Delhi and Ors.