Meera v. Anita & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Revision petition challenging an order allowing a defendant to file a written statement despite a 595-day delay, subject to costs. The High Court noted the Supreme Court's suo motu limitation extension due to COVID-19 protected the defendant and dismissed the revision.
What the court decided
$~3
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- C.R.P. 209/2022
MEERA ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms. Pragya Verma and Mr. Mayank Kumar Verma, Advocates.
versus
ANITA & ORS.
..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Vijay Kinger, Mr. Ashwani Gehlot, Ms. Roopa Nagpal and Mr. Manish Khera, Advocates for R-2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA
O R D E R % 15.01.2024
- This is a revision petition under Section 115 of CPC wherein the petitioner has assailed the impugned order dated 10.10.2022 passed by the learned Trial Court, whereby the respondent/defendant was allowed to file written statement despite delay of 595 days, subject to payment of costs.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Trial Court erred in permitting the defendant to file the written statement after a 595-day delay, subject to costs?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Meera
- respondent
Anita
Coram
Dharmesh Sharma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court