Avinash Singh Jawa v. Kamla Bali
Case brief
What is this about?
Four civil revision petitions were withdrawn as counsel submitted they had been rendered infructuous. The court dismissed the petitions without any adjudication.
What the court decided
$~4 to 7
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- C.R.P. 205/2023 & CM APPL. 40071/2023
AVINASH SINGH JAWA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurav Gogna & Mr. Ravinder Pal Singh, Advs.
versus
SMT SUNITA RANI ..... Respondent Through: Dr. Satish Kumar Tomar, Adv.
- C.R.P. 206/2023 & CM APPL. 40078/2023
AVINASH SINGH JAWA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurav Gogna & Mr. Ravinder Pal Singh, Advs.
versus
KAMLA BALI ..... Respondent Through: Dr. Satish Kumar Tomar, Adv.
- C.R.P. 207/2023 & CM APPL. 40090/2023
AVINASH SINGH JAWA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurav Gogna & Mr. Ravinder Pal Singh, Advs.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Avinash Singh Jawa
- respondent
Smt Sunita Rani
- respondent
Kamla Bali
- respondent
Shalu Singh Chaudhary
- respondent
Smt Sunita Taneja
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court