Writ petition under Article 226 was disposed of upon the petitioner seeking permission to withdraw it during arguments, which the court granted with liberty to approach again in the future.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the Court again in future granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~64
Through: Mr. Prasanna S. and Ms. Swati Arya, Advocates.
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Mr. Shivam Sachdeva, GP for R-1. Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, SPP with Mr. Kushagra Kumar and Mr. Abhinav Bhardwaj, Advocates for CBI.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
FEBRUARY 13, 2024 S. Zakir
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 16:45:45
Prem Nath Arora
Union of India
Subramonium Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
