Defendant's revision against dismissal of her Order VII Rule 11 CPC rejection-of-plaint application and Order 1 Rule 10 CPC deletion application in a tenant's suit for possession and injunction was found meritless; the High Court upheld the trial court's orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
Through: Mr. Sudhir Mendiratta and Mr. Naveen Sharma, Advs.
SURENDER KUMAR VERMA ..... Respondent Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA
CM APPL. 194/2024 (Ex.)
C.R.P. 2/2024 and CM APPL. 193/2024 (Stay)
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2024 at 14:59:15
present revision petition, is that he is a tenant under the petitioner/defendant in respect of the shop in question. He is seeking relief of possession and permanent injunction alleging that he has been forcefully ousted and thrown out of the tenancy shop.
DHARMESH SHARMA, J.
JANUARY 4, 2024 sp
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2024 at 14:59:15
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial court rightly dismissed the defendant's application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC rejecting the plaint and under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC seeking her deletion from the parties.
3 provisions across 1 enactments
Sudha Jain
Surender Kumar Verma
Dharmesh Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
