Petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with liberty to approach the appropriate forum.
Withdrawal of the petition allowed with liberty to approach the appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~7
MS. SHWETA CHAUHAN ..... Petitioner Through: Counsel for the petitioner
versus
UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE CHAIRMAN OF UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Standing Counsel with Mr. Anand Singh, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
O R D E R % 03.01.2024
(The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid Mode)
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
JANUARY 3, 2024 Aj
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2024 at 14:48:46
Ms. Shweta Chauhan
Union of India Through the Chairman of Union Public Service Commission
Tushar Rao Gedela
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
